<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: personal soa &#8211; where you post is irrelevant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glemak.com/blog/index.php/2008/07/13/personal-soa-where-you-post-is-irrelevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glemak.com/blog/2008/07/13/personal-soa-where-you-post-is-irrelevant/</link>
	<description>another nomadic audio production</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:20:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Petherick</title>
		<link>http://glemak.com/blog/2008/07/13/personal-soa-where-you-post-is-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-3173</link>
		<dc:creator>David Petherick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glemak.com/blog/2008/07/13/personal-soa-where-you-post-is-irrelevant/#comment-3173</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, and I think the fact that where we add content is becoming increasingly irrelevant is important, maybe pivotal, for these reasons: - 

1) Information can reach unexpected destinations
2) Nobody owns the conversation, so it can&#039;t be ignored or hidden
3) Everything you say will become public, and can be found in 80 years
4) The authority or credibility of what you say will need a reference point, or digital identity, in order to &#039;establish its credentials&#039; in old media parlance. 
5) Somebody will work out how to monetize this
6) Somebody will work out how to disrupt #5
7) Points 1 to 6 will become irrelevant.

Regards from Scotland, David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, and I think the fact that where we add content is becoming increasingly irrelevant is important, maybe pivotal, for these reasons: &#8211; </p>
<p>1) Information can reach unexpected destinations<br />
2) Nobody owns the conversation, so it can&#8217;t be ignored or hidden<br />
3) Everything you say will become public, and can be found in 80 years<br />
4) The authority or credibility of what you say will need a reference point, or digital identity, in order to &#8216;establish its credentials&#8217; in old media parlance.<br />
5) Somebody will work out how to monetize this<br />
6) Somebody will work out how to disrupt #5<br />
7) Points 1 to 6 will become irrelevant.</p>
<p>Regards from Scotland, David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

